| Face | Full face. Nothing interrupting it. | Triangular lattice. The most open of the three. | Segmented bands. Structure you can read. |
| Airflow to the brakes | Most closed of the three | Most open of the three | Between the other two |
| Who picks it | Someone who wants the car to read as a different object from across a car park. It is the biggest visual change of the three and the one people notice standing still. | A car that is already sporting, and an owner who wants motorsport rather than luxury. It keeps some of the wheel visible, so it reads as a modification rather than a cover. | The middle choice, and the one most people land on. Enough closed area to change the car, enough opening that it does not read as a hubcap. |
| What it costs you | The least airflow and the most surface to keep clean. It is also the least subtle, which is the point, but it is not a quiet choice. | It changes the car least of the three. If you want the full smooth-face effect, this is not it. | It commits to neither extreme. If you know you want maximum airflow or maximum smooth face, one of the other two is the better answer. |
| Living with it | The easiest of the three to actually wipe down, because it is one uninterrupted face rather than a lattice that traps brake dust. | The lattice has the most edges, so brake dust collects in more places than on the closed face. | The offset slots are shallow and wipe out more easily than a deep lattice. |